Process Thinking
Publish and begin. It's nine in the morn. Close 'pon interest and done in/ enough. S'pose be and PAS'ing on Trap (UK youth, music, crime, etc.); Taste (literary, arts and crafty... criticism); Theology (other realms and speculation). Reading: https://www.unz.com/jfreud/we-live-in-the-most-extraordinary-age-of-satanic-prophecy-come-true-ari-asters-hereditary-and-its-vision-of-paimonic-prophecy-and-the-problems-of-prosperity-prophecy/ -and- https://off-guardian.org/2022/06/18/review-is-there-life-after-death/
In answer to the image and bible verse, and the grand illusion in 2022; the spell and unseen poison unsettling and disturbing in-and-all: FEAR.
Two voices stand out and say..., affirm and assert, NOT ME/ NOT DOING.
Max Igan, and; the one-line response to 'C-19', and word to their congregation...
Bethel (church).
We don't do fear.
Taking a look at the 'Bethel Ch.,' response, seems 'they' did go beyond and 'let ya yes be yes, and your...' which isn't quite the solid proclamation informed, over the last two years(?), that a mate said. That they were known, for that line, says much. The pressure to cave in must have been intense.
Here-be the obvious; How can anyone claim to be operating in the mystery and challenging notion of prophecy, (the hearing and speaking-out of God's present and purpose-filled word), go-with financial-riddled, and disputable deception, prone to masquerading as sound science?
We, cannot or shouldn't, assert with black and white confidence, the age or shape of the earth, (one, mega-example). All but first-hand exceptional witnesses and their circumstances, are left to reason on the consensus of available opinion. Observation-lacking personal knowledge ought to assess the measure and capacity to, know, something...
For SURE.
Evidence that (could) decide, requires blatant and unable-to-challenge reason/s. The argument for the reality of said C-19 virus/s causing XYZ, is 'provable', but isn't a 'fact' if all the 'believers' claims are said to be dependent on the C-19 critics having to demonstrate a 'negative' position?
It's up to proclaimers of the establishment hypothesis to bring out the reality of the undeniable, in a means that can be tested or measured. To accept Germ Theory over Territorial Theory, and in the context of C-19 is to be asked and offer back the literature, data and images etc. All and in a position that's public and comprehensive. Anyone who'd like to question, must be given, the material to investigate and decide. How else can language and truth ...matter?
Thus far, the FOIA requests have brought no proof, no admittance from anyone/ organisation/ or country. No answer, and the material 'reality' all and screen-feeding, TELL us, is settled.
Two articles, from, ...the, two websites, on the 'net:
To keep the accounts true, add four else-wise in Aangirfan, Tap, Burning Blogger and Crimes of Empire.
All six, dig 'n delve in 'theology' on occasions. A six-pack of intelligent intoxication covering the world-in-action. Other 'surfing' about and reading is a demonstration and revelation of where we'be at?
What's the value in seeking to explore or discover in the substitutes?
Could it be? Seeking sense in the madness but likin' the lite-light, and fluffy half-measured and baked ambiguity with a level of ambivalence. We're a product of our choices, the mirror and the measure of our guts and fibre.
Questions requiring answers. Ask ourselves. Are we... or..? Preferences define us. The Pulp Fiction (1994) outtake, and example is an ideal exercise.
Because our daily lives are mainly concerned with mundane matters in a world that seems relatively stable and prosperous — even poor people are not starving in the West and have basic amenities — , most of us lack awareness of what an extraordinary period in history we are a part of.
JUNG-FREUD
Do I feed, or do I flow? The write goes on, or reckon on a reader, reading the couple of post on Unz and Off-G. that provoked m'comment and 'Process Thinking'.