PATRICK BERGY
[The killers of Bis to serve 28 years each.] Bis' fam. and lovers: Peace to Y'a
Over half of Britain’s youngsters leave school and spend three years basically studying their own belly buttons, it’s time to ditch the degrees and teach our kids skills they can actually use, Charlie Stone, April 23, 2021
Charlton
Black
P.S Hitsquad x Giggs
12,827 views/ Premiered 104 minutes ago
Rewind
FOUR AM IN THE GROVE
Diana Drill
COVID CLAIMS
VICTIM OF THE SWAMP
Patrick Bergy is an IT security specialist, former candidate for Supervisor of Elections, and PFC in the United States Army. After his honorable discharge from the military, he deployed around the world working as a military contractor providing IT support for the Department of Defense. One of Patrick’s most notable projects was in pioneering social media psychological warfare, also know as Interactive Internet Activities, or IIA, for the Department of Defense in 2008. This was at a time when social networks and smart phones were just taking off. Patrick understood the potential threat such capabilities posed for the very core of U.S. democracy, election integrity. He believed it was already being used by hostile foreign governments.
Patrick has been speaking out since 2014, when he recognized its use in the Michael Brown incident which sparked riots in cities throughout the U.S. He has continued trying to get his message to the public to this day, even predicting the social media influence by hostile foreign governments in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, but his warnings were seemingly ignored. He published his first book, ‘Victim of the Swamp, how the “Deep State” Destroyed the 40 Year Old Private’ in September, 2017.
Brendon O'Connell / Isaac Kappy / SEARCH: TRUTHSCOOP AND PLANT A SEED.
/James R
'It is an outdated notion that people from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras are primarily looking for economic opportunity in the United States and, therefore, should wait in line for a visa.'
'For people fleeing these countries, waiting for a visa can result in death, rape, or forcible recruitment into crime.'
I strongly disagree. The point is that people 100% have the right to flee from a difficult situation, but once they have reached safety, they no longer have the legal right to continue moving to their chosen destination.
It is obvious that they are motivated by economics because otherwise they would stop at Mexico. People routinely flee Afghanistan, travel to Indonesia, where they are safe and then try to get a boat to Australia. It is a cynical abuse of the system, I sympathise with them being in a tough situation and abhor the abuse they face from the goons of Australia but still, people have every right to flee but zero right to choose what nation they want to impose themselves upon.
This perversion of the refugee process is being pushed by the globalists partly because they believe no nation, especially a Western nation, has the right to a distinct identity.
A far better solution would be for the West to stop attacking nations based on lies and stop backing terrorist groups when they fight against "approved" enemies.