Still no prayer – praying. Should refrain from writing until. Short reiterate. Some theory. But 'no words' – no unction.

Can't remember who? Maybe young Evan Roberts – if it was, stood in the revival on the platform to speak, and said, “no word, nothing to say”.

And all our words from all us Christians? Can hardly read a paragraph of mine and not want to stop. Clangs and clunks. Will try and get through some, so as to quote. Save re-explaning. Ground to sow into.

This weekend, grieved overall lack of action. Online outposts aren't growing fast and furious enough. Truther-planting, more of a struggle than should be. These are lookouts. Our…

We've adequate vision but we need more eyes and voices to signpost what's seen. More is better. More is cumulative and defensive.

My different-vision but compliments along, is about prayer.

Where, who – like me, spluttering along in a frail half-doing? Wanting to acknowledge the necessity for this. For… this, is what we're to do.

Less and quickly here and better do that – than this. I'm trying to do both simultaneously but this ain't the way.

The way…

Reminds me of 'Flame of God'/Amy Carmichael. 'Not this way went the Crucified'.

Awake and Praying? This is my Ad. Connect and spark. Write-me and let's agree.

How dark must it get?

Ambitious about 'my' life, truly full-of-vision. Galvanised by wild dreams:

How to provide for, and/or by faith; some kind of roof, minimal food – simple and plain, once daily eat, have little-as 'association'. A prisoner in a cell. One book (be blessed if…). This – until the end. Oh, a bit of physical fitness. Possibly this site and other, to tap some expression. Have a 'word' to share.

(We do get the net is under threat? Like ne'er before.This site is, with the like, most contested. Matt Drudge has revealed the extent and intentions. The battle is nowhere fiercer than over this. And the one tactic, is 'divide and rule', challenged by those under threat to “shut-up”. Publicly).

Back to me in the corner; A caravan, a tent, a van or a shack. Anywhere. With one – so-far – unknown, could I meet others to pray with?

On to thought for this morn:

We live by images of gods. 'Powers' live by them. The ones under these powers' direction, through intentional collective rituals, steer the NWO. By way of images and gods.

Getting and giving in the immediacy of their 'experiences'. But continue to speculate, operate as perverse 'prayer'-type meetings. This, is why they must. To somehow feed or enable these evil spirits. To somehow shape world events. Enable. Somehow?

The reason they illuminate their Illuminati-ish ways, some say, is because of realities constructed dynamics. And/or part of their metaphysical means. Unquestionably 'they' believe this. And yes, there's something to this. Glimmers of discernment… (somehow need to find in scripture the suss).

False-flags are set-up such, easily demonstrating, disclosure is primary. Why and how and more importantly, what for? There's no reasonable, otherwise, explanation. Certainly not for abstract symbolic show. And even-more than what it does to the masses and messages to elites.

What's generally supposed by commentators – if at all – is that God made it, this way. Devils have an agreement. A sphere of responsibility. All dependent on us. Devil's Advocate etc.

They reveal and tell, to have authority. While this is true, we comply/they take ground. We adhere/they gain our allegiance. Etc. etc.

There's more.

The less-hear said: We pray, especially if possible in our holy-cabals and this, the direct counter-action. Further, we're only as free to speak and live in these places we can, because people prayed/are praying.

All who type, speak up or image out against the target, are calling down, pulling-down, these images and thereby powers. There's a stage where it suits enemy purposes, another level where it does them damage.

It's not 'prayer' but not-not, related.

Central most-influential ones meeting in spaces – battle this. Elites in covens – and Jesus-people in prayer. It's not a dualism. Although, neither is this a way of understanding, without merit.

Think Elijah.

One final t.

Re-appropriating C.S. Lewis 'Men without Chests' from its central meaning around the scourge of relativism. The image and talk of 'The Abolition of Man' is prescient. Prophetic. (If I or someone, can find how to release?)

The Abolition of Man was the first 'Christian' book I bought and read.

How can 'all we need is love' (and this cannot be undermined) become a chest-less compromise? When is hate, love? And why am I – jumbo-jet wimp over decades – unable to find one man (inc. females/of course) out and about? Online. In my eyes, accessible to contact/with a chest?

Who knows why-prayer and who and what is coming?

When He returns – sure, this all will conclude. But until, we're to be in battle. The children demand this. Christ cries out for this.

Where are the people of God?

Why is this absence, evidently the case?

A refusal to repent. One. Traditional or progressive theology that cannot see the signs or the times. That God isn't present and active. Urgent and with rightly understood burdens to share. How come?

Syria here and now -or- over 'there' and far, far from our green and pleasant?

Lost their chests. Sorry to say, and there is and maybe, much I don't understand why but women and men have lost them. Unless, sound like captivity, is at the door?

It's like relativism. Even if in theory, the opposite confessed. It's a form of acquiescence to Babylon. A not calling this down. (Not) knowing what this is? While knowing God who wants to vanquish the enemy. Not partly and somewhat but… OUT. We need the enemy OUT.

I hear a 'chest'.